Trade Cases
WTO Members Critical of U.S. National Security Measures
Written by Sandy Williams
July 10, 2018
The World Trade Organization is keeping busy fielding complaints from countries concerned about U.S. trade policies. So far seven countries have filed requests to the WTO for consultation with the U.S. on Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Russia was the latest to file a complaint, charging that the Section 232 measures violate WTO rules under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Safeguards. Norway, Mexico, Canada, the EU, India and China have filed similar complaints claiming that the U.S. tariffs are safeguards rather than national security measures.
Other WTO members, such as Hong Kong, Thailand and Turkey, have not filed their own disputes, but have asked to be third parties to the consultations.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has pushed back on the safeguard argument, maintaining that under GATT “each sovereign country must have the power to decide, for itself, what actions are essential to its security.”
“Rather than work with the United States, [the EU and others] have retaliated with tariffs designed to punish U.S. companies and workers,” said Lighthizer. “In an effort to give cover to this blatant disregard for WTO rules, they claim to be acting in reliance on a narrow exception that applies only in response to a safeguard measure. That exception does not apply here, however, because the United States has not taken a safeguard measure.”
The Section 232 measures on steel and aluminum, as well as proposed measures on autos exported to the U.S., were central to discussions at the WTO Goods Council meeting in Geneva last week. GATT issues fall under the purview of the Goods Council. Members at the meeting discussed how the U.S. measures will affect global value chains, consumer costs and the multilateral trading system.
Members struggled to see how U.S. national security could be threatened by the import of automobiles and auto parts. Over 40 WTO members spoke at the meeting, warning that imposing auto tariffs could seriously disrupt the global market and multilateral trading system.
Russia, which along with Japan initiated the auto tariff discussions at the meeting, said the U.S. is losing its reputation as a trusted trading partner by threatening the rules of the global trading system. Japan postulated that auto tariffs would lead to an avalanche of retaliatory measures.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
CRU: Turkey imposes tariffs on steel imports; Malaysia launches AD probe
Ankara has placed anti-dumping duties of ranging from 6.10% to 43.31% on hot-rolled steel sheet from China, India, Japan, and Russia. Meanwhile, Malaysia has announced it will investigate allegedly dumped steel wire rod from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home
The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.