Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Trump's Changing the 'World Order'
Written by Tim Triplett
June 10, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest trade news in Washington:
Is there anyone out there who believes President Trump is not methodically alienating our closest allies? Yesterday, in what was clearly a deliberate attempt to provoke the other six members of the G7, President Trump declared that the conference was a success, and that the G7 should work toward barrier-free trade among that group. Of course, he also advocated readmitting Russia to the group, reconstituting the G8, but did not advocate including Russia in the barrier-free trade group.
Prime Minister Trudeau, after declaring that the G7 communique was ready and would be joined by the United States, proceeded to declare the U.S. an outlier. The response was predictable—President Trump withdrew from the communique.
There is a definite pattern here. President Trump is not ham-handedly offending our closest allies—he is doing it in a very calculated way. The trade relationships and trade rules we have gotten used to since 1947 are, if President Trump has his way, going to change and change fundamentally. He is knocking our closest partners out of their comfort zone and he wants to do it. As long as our trading partners argue that the Trump proposals are unacceptable, he will double down on them. At the end of the day, there will either be a confrontation or a negotiation. We are clearly in the confrontation stage now. Neither Trump nor the other G7 members look likely to come together for a while. Eventually, the EU, Canada and Mexico will put their issues on the table and maybe then negotiations can take place. In the meantime, NAFTA negotiations appear to be on ice. The steel and aluminum tariffs will remain in place in their comprehensive form.
Make no mistake—President Trump wants to change fundamentally the international trade “world order.” He wants reciprocal tariff balance for particular products (e.g., autos). He wants to create a two-tiered trading system: one for the G7 countries and another for everyone else. That would destroy the “MFN” principle at the core of the WTO. He has made the dispute settlement system at the WTO nearly unworkable by blocking new appointments to the Appellate Body, the “Supreme Court” of the WTO. He wants bilateral trade deals as opposed to regional deals, because they maximize U.S. leverage. Bilateral deals are inconsistent with his proposal for completely open trade within the G7, but consistency is not what he is after. He is after improving the U.S. balance of trade in goods.
So far, the reaction of our allies has been hostile. Because I think there is a lot of benefit from the global trading system, I believe it is worth fixing rather than destroying. Perhaps our trading partners believe they can outwait President Trump. In 2021 he will be replaced, they hope, with someone that will deal with our closest friends in more traditional ways. This may be wishful (and unrealistic) thinking. I am not sure we can rebuild the postwar consensus with a new administration (assuming we have a new one in 2021). Populism and protectionism is on the rise elsewhere, too.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
www.lellawoffice.com
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.