Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/767956b3ac429b5f48c3724163f0bd7e.jpg)
Country-of-Origin Appeal Ruling Favors Steel Mills
Written by Sandy Williams
May 1, 2018
A ruling that will assist in the enforcing measures against circumvention was approved this week by the U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The court ruled that the “substantial transformation analysis” is approved for use by Commerce in determining country-of-origin for products subject to antidumping and countervailing duties. The substantial transformation test determines if a product from one country is substantially changed by processing done in another country, thereby changing its country-of-origin designation. The ruling was a win for U.S. steel companies that presented the appeal to the court.
Bell Supply challenged a Commerce Department ruling in 2014 that green tubes produced in China and finished as OCTG in third countries were “not substantially transformed during the finishing process, even if that process includes heat treatment” and, therefore, were still products originating in China.
Bell Supply won its case after the CIT ruled that substantial transformation analysis was an inappropriate tool for determining whether importers were circumventing AD/CVD duties. Commerce instead was required to conduct a circumvention inquiry under Title 19 § 1677j of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations before imposing AD/CVD restrictions on products imported from countries not identified in the order.
Explains Inside U.S. Trade, “That provision prevents importers from avoiding AD or CVD orders by routing merchandise through a third country and applies to ‘merchandise imported into the United States [that] is of the same class or kind as any merchandise produced in a foreign country that is the subject of’ an AD or CVD order, and is assembled or completed in a third country not subject to the order.” The CIT ruling was remanded back to Commerce.
In 2015, Commerce again ruled that AD/CVD duties applied to OCTG made from green tubes even when finished in a third country. Bell Supply appealed again and CIT ruled Commerce’s use of substantial transformation analysis renders § 1677 “superfluous” because the test is “an agency-created device to achieve the same purpose.”
In a second redetermination, Commerce ruled that OCTG finished in a third country should not be subject to AD/CVD orders. That decision was promptly appealed by U.S. steel companies who produce OCTG.
The U.S. Court of Appeals said it in its decision last week that it disagreed with CITs interpretation of “products finished in countries subject to AD or CVD orders, and products finished in third countries.” In its opinion, the court said, the substantial transformation test determines whether “the product ‘loses its identity and is transformed into a new product having a new name, character and use,’” as a result of manufacturing. The court vacated and remanded the case back to CIT.
“We conclude that Commerce is entitled to use the substantial transformation analysis to determine country of origin before resorting to the circumvention inquiry,” said the court in its opinion. “Where an imported article is ‘from’ can be an inherently ambiguous question. Because a single article can be assembled from various components and undergo multiple finishing steps, Commerce must have some way to determine the country of origin during scope inquiries.”
The opinion went on to say that, “even if a product assumes a new identity, the process of ‘assembly or completion’ may still be minor or insignificant, and undertaken for the purpose of evading an AD or CVD order.”
“This IS a big deal,” commented trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz. “ It establishes a clear road map for the orderly consideration of scope and circumvention issues. Now, the rule seems to be that Commerce must first determine whether imported products are within the scope of an order. Part of that analysis is to determine the country of origin. If Commerce concludes that a product undergoes a substantial transformation in a non-covered country (and Commerce has a different way of looking at this from Customs), then circumvention analysis is necessary to include the product under an order. If the product does not undergo substantial transformation, as Commerce found in Bell Supply, then the product is within the scope of the order and circumvention analysis is inappropriate.”
Note: Inside U.S. Trade was used as a reference for this article.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry