Trade Cases
G20 Officials Stress Importance of Free Trade
Written by Sandy Williams
March 19, 2018
Cryptocurrency policy took a backseat to global trade at the start of the 2018 G20 Summit. Officials gathered in Buenos Aires warned that U.S. protectionist policies may threaten global economic growth.
“The first risk is the risk of inward looking policies and protectionism,” said European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs Pierre Moscovici on Monday.
G-20 members are concerned that Trump’s global tariffs on aluminum and steel, and expected new tariffs on Chinese technology and consumer goods, are leading to trade war.
“There is a solid understanding among the global community that free trade is important,” Haruhiko Kuroda, Japan’s central bank governor, told reporters.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin pushed back saying he could not sacrifice U.S. interests to ensure that the global free trade system works.
One U.S. official said that Mnuchin represents the president’s strong belief in free trade. “But the environment we’re in now, where the expectation is America totally subordinates its national interests in order for the free trade system to work, is just one we don’t accept. So, we’ve been very clear, we believe in free trade with reciprocal terms that lead to more balanced trade relationships,” he said.
Trade ministers from numerous countries are petitioning the U.S. to be exempted from the 25 percent tariff on steel and 10 percent tariff on aluminum.
Germany’s Economy Minister Peter Altmaier said discussions with Commerce Secretary Ross regarding an exemption for the EU were “constructive” and could make it “possible to find a solution that can still avoid a decline into a heavy trade conflict.” He added that it was unclear whether differences could be resolved by the March 23 deadline when the Section 232 tariffs will go into effect.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.