Trade Cases
China and Germany to Work on Steel Overcapacity Within G20
Written by Sandy Williams
March 18, 2018
China and German have agreed to work together to find solutions for steel overcapacity within the framework of the G20 group of nations.
In a phone call on Saturday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Chinese President Xi Jingping discussed the importance of multilateral cooperation in global trade and the need for the two countries to become “advocates for new-type international relations.” The agreement was in response to the shift by the current U.S. administration toward protectionism.
“China-Germany relations will steadily proceed for as long as they adhere to equality and mutual respect, understand and care for each other’s core interests and major concerns, and properly control and handle their differences,” Xinhua said, attributing the comments to Xi.
G20 is scheduled to meet beginning on Monday in Buenos Aires, Argentina. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin is scheduled to discuss steel overcapacity with German Finance Minister Olaf Scholz on the sidelines of the summit meeting.
The Section 232 tariffs to be imposed by the United States are expected to be a central issue at the talks. Argentina’s Treasury Minister Nicholas Dujovne stressed that G20 will continue to support “the crucial role of the rules-based international trading system.”
“We aim to reach an agreement in terms of maintaining the wording of the Hamburg communique (about) sustaining the benefits of free trade,” said Dujovne.
Trump has been critical of both China and Germany for their trade surpluses with the United States. Merkel said on Friday that the proposed U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum violate the principles of the World Trade Organization.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.