Trade Cases
Letter to the Editor: Scared to Death
Written by Tim Triplett
March 4, 2018
Steel Market Update received the following letter from a manufacturing company located in New England. This company is one of hundreds across the country who are concerned that President Trump’s tariff will increase their costs to manufacture products in the United States and they will then lose business to those who are providing the same products, only manufactured in Mexico.
John,
I am a partner in a small regional steel building manufacturing company that is scared to death of this announcement by our president.
We currently compete on a regional basis with much larger companies that manufacture a good percentage of their steel framing in Mexico and ship fabricated steel products over the border. These U.S. companies have sent their requirements to the south where they are manufacturing and then shipping up to the states. Up until now their chief advantage has been lower cost for labor.
With this announcement and rising raw steel prices their advantage will only increase. If this takes hold like it appears, more finished products will ship north without any tariffs on the raw steel that they were produced from. This type of policy could quickly put smaller U.S. manufacturers like ourselves out of business in a very short period of time.
I would appreciate your comments.
Thank you,
Bob Fisette
Package Steel Systems, Inc.
15 Harback Rd.
Sutton, MA 01590
Steel Market Update asked Mr. Fisette how their domestic suppliers were treating them and we were told, “…Our suppliers are taking a wait and see approach. Over the last 6-8 weeks they and we have received increases from the mills in anticipation of 232. Now that it is becoming reality, everyone is waiting to see how hard the mills push this.”
If you would like to make a comment, please send them to: John@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Leibowitz on trade: How much will the Trump tariffs hurt the US? How much will they help?
The benefits from higher tariffs are speculative and unproven. The disruptions caused by tariffs and other trade restrictions are better documented and cannot be rationally denied. For the tariffs to be good policy, the Trump argument must therefore be sure that the benefits to the US exceed the cost of these disruptions. Otherwise, we have madness masquerading as policy.
Trump to place 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, 10% on China starting Tuesday
The Trump administration will implement 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 10% tariffs on China, according to a White House fact sheet and executive orders circulated on Saturday. The administration said that it would tariff “energy resources” from Canada at a lower rate – 10%. The tariffs will go into effect at 12:01 ET on Tuesday, according to an executive order. The White House documents made no mention of exemptions.
Canacero claims ‘surge’ of US steel exports, backs retaliation against potential tariffs
Mexican steel trade association Canacero said US steel exports represent “a threat to the Mexican steel industry.” Canacero also backed retaliatory measures if President Trump enacts 25% tariffs on Mexico by Feb. 1.
Updated timeline for coated steel trade case
Less-than-fair-value investigations The US Commerce Department has agreed to postpone preliminary decisions in the corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) antidumping duty (AD) investigations. Commerce said in a Federal Register filing that it will now issue initial AD margin determinations by April 3. The deadline had previously been Feb. 12. The extension comes after domestic petitioners requested earlier […]
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as Feb. 1
President Donald Trump said on Monday evening that he was considering placing tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. The president said the tariffs could go into effect as soon as Feb. 1. President Trump threatened the tariffs as he signed a raft of executive orders in front of reporters in the Oval […]