Trade Cases

U.S./China Talks Unproductive

Written by Sandy Williams


Trade talks with China this week ended in a stalemate after the U.S. pressed for “more fair” trade terms. The discussions were described as “a frank exchange” but little if any agreement was reached on bilateral trade and economic issues, according to a senior U.S. official. A press conference following the meeting was canceled and no joint statement was issued.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said, “China acknowledged our shared objective to reduce the trade deficit, which both sides will work cooperatively to achieve.”

U.S. officials pressured China to make substantial cuts to steel capacity and reduce its trade surplus, according to a Washington Post source.

The U.S. says the $347 billion trade deficit with China is not a result of market forces but of distorted trade practices. On Wednesday, President Trump told a reporter that tariffs on steel “could happen.” The White House has scheduled a rally on Tuesday in the heart of steel country in Youngstown, Ohio, where it is speculated that the President will announce steel tariffs as a result of the Section 232 national security investigation.

The two sides appeared to make some progress on expansion of investment and trade in services. The Chinese embassy in Washington called it “significant progress” and said, “The two sides will expand areas of cooperation in services and increase trade in services; expand mutual investment; and create a more open, equitable, transparent and convenient investment environment.”

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.