Trade Cases

Bourbon Producers Steel for Retaliatory Measures by EU

Written by Sandy Williams


U.S. bourbon exports are on the table for a retaliatory tax should Section 232 cut off EU steel exports. Bourbon, made almost exclusively in Kentucky, accounted for 20 percent of the $654 million of U.S. spirits sold to the European Union in 2016, according to a recent article in The Guardian.

Officials confirmed that U.S. whiskey exports are among the products targeted for a potential retaliatory response by the EU. At the G20 meetings last week, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said the EU would act within days against U.S. agricultural exports if import tariffs are imposed on steel from the European Union.

Bourbon, by Congressional declaration, can only be manufactured in the United States. The industry in Kentucky brings in $166 million in tax revenue for the state annually and employs nearly 17,500 people, according to the Kentucky Distillers Association.

Susan Reigler, president of the Bourbon Women Association, told The Guardian that the industry will be harmed if the whiskey exports are targeted by the EU. “It’s not just the people who work in the distilleries, or the bottling plants, but also people like the grain farmers and the truckers who transport it,” she said.

“Global markets are increasingly important to our signature industry, and we have worked hard over the past decade to open doors, level the playing field and eliminate discriminatory tariffs and policies that would put Kentucky bourbon at a competitive disadvantage,” said Eric Gregory, president of KDA.

Kentucky is home to Republican U.S. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and supported Trump with a 62.5 percent vote in the election.

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.