Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d144/2d144d44e66e6136d64486e324e1d07b619cee8c" alt=""
Cabinet Members 'Pushing Back' Against Commerce, Section 232 Remedies
Written by John Packard
June 18, 2017
On Friday afternoon, Steel Market Update learned the U.S. Department of Commerce Section 232 briefings with Capitol Hill on steel remedies scheduled for Friday were cancelled. The reason for the cancellation, according to World Trade Online, was the lack of progress within the administration on its approach to the issue.
The briefing was to have been held with the Senate Finance and House Ways & Means committees. This is the second cancellation of the briefing, which was originally scheduled for Monday, June 12.
World Trade Online is reporting cabinet members and senior economic advisers “…expressed concern with the scope of the effort, as well as its potential impact on the U.S. economy.”
The briefing just cancelled has not been rescheduled.
World Trade Online sources are reporting Commerce has not yet completed its analysis and “there is still work to do.” Much of that work includes providing “substantive responses” to questions that are being asked with the DOC, as well as with other agencies.
“The source added that the final report to the president on the investigation could still come next week, but that the internal disagreements would have to be settled first.”
President Trump has been promising “major legislation” on steel and aluminum. A World Trade Online source told them the Trump administration is respecting the “oversight authority” that Congress has on the Section 232 process, and it is most likely that the recommendations would not include any legislation for Congress to consider.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dbb/86dbb0d3b496ed0eee897be96c3f427d3b4c83d8" alt=""
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.