Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c6ab/5c6ab1ffa6e62b517ca24c69ab78c7c84705f358" alt=""
Section 232 Decision Must Take Effect Within 15 Days of the Announcement
Written by John Packard
June 13, 2017
Steel buyers and traders of foreign steel who have orders on the books and vessels on the water need to be aware the Section 232 statute states that when the president of the United States receives the recommendation from the U.S. Department of Commerce, he then has 90 days to make an announcement. Once the announcement is made by the president, the resulting action, by statute, must go into effect within 15 days. This means any vessels on the water or product that is on order would be impacted almost immediately once the decision has been made by President Trump.
The rumors are flying regarding the Section 232 steel investigation being conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce. President Trump’s Press Secretary Sean Spicer reported yesterday that Secretary Wilbur Ross was due to provide the president with an update on the status of the investigation later this week. Many have suggested that this week’s update may actually be the final report with the DOC recommendations.
“It’s coming, and it’s coming very quickly,” trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz told Steel Market Update this afternoon. He went on to say, “This is the first real move this president has made, and the evidence suggests he wants to make a splash with it.”
The rumor mill has suggested special tariffs and other remedies to assist the domestic steel mills may be coming. If that is indeed the case, there may be a much larger negative reaction from the end manufacturers. Earlier today, SMU participated in a conference call with HARDI wholesalers and related manufacturers. One of the manufacturers commented that steel coils they buy are not readily available from domestic steel mills. If foreign steel is blocked, then it may be necessary for them to go to China (or elsewhere) to procure finished products.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dbb/86dbb0d3b496ed0eee897be96c3f427d3b4c83d8" alt=""
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.