SMU Data and Models

Steel Mill Price Negotiations: Hot Rolled Yes, Others Not So Much
Written by John Packard
August 4, 2016
The following information was collected from our flat rolled steel market trends survey which we have been conducting since Monday of this week. Much of the collection information is similar to the Lead Times article above as this question is posed to manufacturing companies and distributors.
What we are trying to discover is if there is any change in the trend for the steel mills to either negotiate or not negotiate spot flat rolled prices with their customers at this time. The blue bars represent those who are reporting the mills as not negotiable while the green bars are those reporting the mills as negotiable.
We produce this report by product and you can see why in the responses below. There is a very big difference between hot rolled and all of the other flat rolled products. Seventy-three percent of the respondents reported HR as being price negotiable. At the same time cold rolled (23 percent), galvanized (39 percent) and Galvalume (zero percent) were products that were less negotiable.
SMU will be watching hot rolled spot prices carefully over the coming weeks to see if the product breaks through the $590 level which we currently have as the bottom of the price range according to our HRC index.
We remind our readers these results are based on responses to our survey. Each individual mill may have different approaches to negotiations and steel markets can be quite volatile and change quickly. It is important to stay close to your suppliers to make sure you are being kept up to date as to what they are doing and how your company fits into their plans.
A side note: The data for both lead times and negotiations comes from only service center and manufacturer respondents. We do not include commentary from the steel mills, trading companies, or toll processors in this particular group of questions.
To see an interactive history of our Steel Mill Negotiations data, visit our website here.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU Survey: Buyers’ Sentiment Indices slip, but optimism remains
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both declined this week but remain strong. This indicates buyers are still optimistic about their companies' ability for success.

SMU Survey: Mill lead times extend, buyers question sustainability
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported longer lead times this week on all of the sheet and plate products SMU tracks.

SMU Survey: Very little wiggle room on mill pricing, buyers say
The majority of the steel buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that domestic mills are not open to negotiating prices on new orders this week.

SMU’s February at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of key SMU steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through February 28th.

Steelmaking raw materials more expensive in February
Prices for six of the seven steelmaking raw materials SMU tracks are increased from January to February, according to our latest analysis.