Trade Cases
Hot Rolled Antidumping Ruling Due on Tuesday
Written by John Packard
March 13, 2016
The U.S. Department of Commerce (US DOC) is scheduled to release their Preliminary Determination of Antidumping (AD) against Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey and the United Kingdom. This is the third and final Preliminary Determination to be announced on flat rolled steel products. Previously we saw rulings on corrosion resistant (galvanized/Galvalume) and cold rolled.
China and Russia were not involved in the hot rolled trade case as there have been previous rulings or agreements made which essentially are preventing both countries from shipping hot rolled to the United States at this time.
The key countries to watch on Tuesday are Korea (which supplies at least 50 percent of the feed stock to USS/Posco on the West Coast), Brazil (where a portion of their exports go to feed CSN in Terre Haute, IN) and Australia (which feeds its Steelscape mill in Washington state).
There evidently is some confidence by a number of the countries as they continue to export HRC to the United States despite (or perhaps because of) previous CVD and critical circumstances rulings.
The only country to have a countervailing duty (CVD) ruling against it was Brazil (as the US DOC did not receive all of the data requested) and their rate was placed at 7.42 percent. Brazil and Japan were both found to have critical circumstances which means any required deposits would be retroactive 90 days from the publication of the ruling in the Federal Register.
Other than Brazil, all of the other countries, Korea, Turkey, Australia, Japan, the Netherland and the United Kingdom have yet to receive a negative ruling against them on HRC.
Knowing that the AD ruling was to be made in early March (originally it was scheduled to be released last week but was moved out one week due to inclement weather in Washington, DC) Korea (16,000 tons), Turkey (19,000 tons) and the Netherlands (25,000 tons) each have requests for licenses for the month of March.
The rest of the mills: Brazil, Japan, United Kingdom and Australia have little to no license requests for HRC for March.
We will have full coverage of the AD ruling when it is made available sometime on Tuesday afternoon to early evening.
After this ruling we move into the final phase of the trade suits with Final Determinations to come from the US Department of Commerce (most are due in May) and then Final ITC Ruling which are due in July. The first ruling will be on corrosion resistant followed by cold rolled and then hot rolled.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.