Steel Mills
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/0ef9e6deceda2ffbb148e161d8771e5c.jpg)
USW Expresses Frustration with ArcelorMittal Negotiations
Written by Sandy Williams
February 25, 2016
The USW negotiating committee for ArcelorMittal posted a passionate 25th update to the USW website on Wednesday, Feb. 24. The committee called ArcelorMittal “hell bent” on ignoring the real issues and insisting on health care and contract demands on “principle” than on true cost savings.
The committee and management have been in negotiations for a new labor contract since June 2015 and members have been working under terms of the expired contract since Sept. 1.
Update #25 is reprinted below:
Last June when we began negotiations we all knew it was going to be a challenge, but we assumed that our tradition of good faith bargaining would eventually lead us to a fair and equitable contract. We still believe that with our continued unity and solidarity we will achieve our goal! What we did not anticipate was that ArcelorMittal would be so “hell-bent” on ignoring the real issues and would be so focused on insisting that the employees and the retirees pay for the “ills” of the industry.
For decades our industry has struggled to be viable and sustainable. We have adapted to huge technological changes and workplace re-designs so we could be competitive in the global market. In fact, today, because of past capital improvements (to the credit of the Company) and because of our efforts to be flexible and improve productivity, quality, yield and customer satisfaction (to the credit of the employees), we are the most productive steelworkers in the world.
We all realize (both management and the employees) that the steel industry in the U.S. is currently suffering and continues to experience the negative effects of unfair trade and currency manipulation. However, we will continue to fight to stop subsidized and illegally imported foreign products from flooding the domestic market which creates downward pressure on prices and disruptions throughout the supply chain.
Our “partnership” with the Company to stop the dumping of steel products and the unfair trade issues is the absolute right thing for us to do! Our jobs, our future and our security are too important to just leave it up to management to fix. We must not only work with them, but we need to continue to lead the fight for a “level playing field” in the global steel industry.
When we started bargaining, we wanted to approach negotiations with a desire to solve the problems that we share with the Company so that we could all succeed together. We knew the Company had lost hundreds of millions of dollars since our last negotiations, and although we were concerned about the financial results, we also had issues with some of the financial reporting. Some of the financial reporting has to do with non-cash liability issues (which has more to do with stock price than profit and loss), and they report some financial charges which we feel are unjustified, such as tens of millions of dollars per year for branding fees to ArcelorMittal in London, the parent company (remember we are ArcelorMittal USA).
Irrespective of the non-cash and branding issues, ArcelorMittal USA still has problems with long term profitability. Recognizing such, we were more than prepared with ideas, solutions and commitments to help solve the problems and develop a foundation for long term sustainability.
We wanted, and still want, to work with management for the benefit of our members, our retirees, our future and the future of the industry, and we will continue to strive for a positive relationship. However, it is clear that management’s past and current attitude has been “their way or the highway,” but neither “their way” nor the “highway” is the right solution!
ArcelorMittal’s short term focus and contract demands (including the Company’s persistent drive to lower our health care benefits, demands for unreasonable increases in retiree premiums and reduced benefits, demands to lower incentive coverage, weakened Severance and SUB provisions among other ridiculous proposals) does nothing to return the Company to consistent success and does absolutely nothing to address the real problems facing the industry. In fact, we have come to the realization that although we have offered innovative proposals that will reduce costs, management insists on more cuts just on what appears to be “principle” alone.
When we started, the company proposed a contract with no wage increases. We recognized the need for fixed cost stability and offered a contract with a system of lump sum payments based on Hot Band pricing. Our solution is not a perfect one, but frankly, if pricing does not return to the market, our industry will not recover from the attack of unfair trade in steel.
The Company also insisted on major reductions in vacation pay, sickness and accident benefits and a two-tier wage and health care plan for new hires; they have finally withdrawn these demands, while other un-needed demands remain.
Management is still proposing major changes to health care design for both active employees and retirees. Their proposals would reduce coverage and increase employee and retiree costs while at the same time significantly increasing the monthly premium contributions for current and future retirees that will more than double their current contributions. Management also continues to insist on eliminating incentives for employees in Labor Grade 1 jobs. This makes no sense and does nothing to reduce actual costs.
We want to remind you where we started, and although the work is not yet complete, our unity and your solidarity with your Negotiating Committee is still necessary while the struggle for a fair and equitable contract continues. Management has moved off of some of the meaningless proposals and adjusted some of their more erroneous demands, but as of today, ArcelorMittal is still insisting on demands that will only lower our standard of living and will not be helpful to the long term stability of the Company.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/stelco.png)
Steel Summit 2024: Stelco CEO reflects on strategy, growth, and sale to Cleveland-Cliffs
In a candid fireside chat with SMU Senior Analyst/Editor David Schollert, Stelco’s CEO Alan Kestenbaum opened up about Stelco’s pending sale to Cliffs, his business strategy, outlook for the industry, and plans for the future. The chat took place on Tuesday, Aug. 24, at the 2024 SMU Steel Summit in Atlanta.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/AISI.png)
AISI: US steel shipments unchanged in July vs. June, down on-year
Domestic steel shipments remained nearly flat in July month over month but fell from a year earlier.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/white_house.png)
Media reports: Biden could block USS sale on national security concerns
President Joe Biden could block the $15-billion sale of U.S. Steel to Japan's Nippon Steel by citing national security concerns That’s according to reporting in the Washington Post and the Financial Times that was later picked up by the New York Times as well as in wire services.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/US_Steel.png)
USS threatens to cut ‘thousands’ of jobs, move HQ if Nippon sale blocked
U.S. Steel could slash thousands of jobs, shift away from integrated steelmaking, and move its headquarters out of Pittsburgh if its acquisition by Nippon Steel isn’t completed, the company’s top executive said. “We want elected leaders and other key decision makers to recognize the benefits of the deal was well as the unavoidable consequences if the deal fails,” company President and CEO David Burritt said in a statement on Wednesday.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/SSAB.png)
CRU: SSAB to expand Mobile plate mill
SSAB plans to spend $12 million to boost production capacity at its electric-arc furnace (EAF) plate mill in Mobile, Ala. The Sweden-based steelmaker will do that by expanding the existing furnace there. Shot blast equipment will also be upgraded. The expanded capacity is expected to come online late next year. The mill currently has an […]