SMU Data and Models

SMU Survey Respondents Report Slowing Demand
Written by John Packard
November 10, 2015
Last week Steel Market Update (SMU) conducted our early November flat rolled steel market analysis. During the two step process we asked our respondents to comment on demand trends, both as a group (step one) and then again when broken out into their various market segments (step two). We ask questions related to demand again so we can compare how various industry segments are seeing demand trends from their customers.
Step One:
All of our respondents are hit with the following question early in the market analysis process: Are you seeing demand for your products improving, remaining the same or declining?
As you can see by the graphic below, since mid third quarter our respondents as a group have been indicating a change in the demand trend, with approximately one third of the respondents reporting demand as declining vs. 10 percent reporting demand as improving.
Step Two:
We break out into groups and we ask each group to comment on demand (or releases of steel by their customers). Manufacturing and distribution are the two main market segments we look at to understand how the groups view demand.
Manufacturing companies have been signaling a slowdown. Optimism has begun to wane going back to early third quarter when we saw a shrinking percentage of companies advising that demand for their products was improving. By late third quarter, and now into fourth quarter, the percentage of those companies reporting demand as declining began to grow. Slightly more than one third of our manufacturing respondents (and this is the single largest group that participates in our market analysis) reported demand as either declining marginally (33%) or substantially (4%).
From the service center perspective you can see an even more dramatic view of the negative trend, expanding from the high 20’s at the beginning of the third quarter to last week’s 63 percent reporting their customers as releasing less steel.
Our Opinion:
In our opinion this reduction in demand is playing havoc with mill lead times, new orders and, ultimately, spot steel prices. Both the end users (manufacturing companies) and distributors are trying to control inventories (both spot and contract) which delays the re-order process.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models

SMU Survey: Buyers’ Sentiment Indices slip, but optimism remains
SMU’s Buyers’ Sentiment Indices both declined this week but remain strong. This indicates buyers are still optimistic about their companies' ability for success.

SMU Survey: Mill lead times extend, buyers question sustainability
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported longer lead times this week on all of the sheet and plate products SMU tracks.

SMU Survey: Very little wiggle room on mill pricing, buyers say
The majority of the steel buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that domestic mills are not open to negotiating prices on new orders this week.

SMU’s February at a glance
SMU’s Monthly Review provides a summary of key SMU steel market metrics for the previous month, with the latest data updated through February 28th.

Steelmaking raw materials more expensive in February
Prices for six of the seven steelmaking raw materials SMU tracks are increased from January to February, according to our latest analysis.