Market Segment
Canadian Judge Lets Objections to US Steel Debt Remain in Proceedings
Written by Sandy Williams
August 20, 2015
US Steel Corp. lost its bid to keep objections to its debt claims out of the CCAA proceedings for US Steel Canada. US Steel claims it is owed $2.2 billion by USSC, an amount that the United Steelworkers, the province, and former Stelco president Bob Milbourne question.
Justice Herman Wilton-Siegel in his decision wrote that there were “good reasons” for keeping objections in the restructuring proceedings including improving the chance to find a solution in that will keep the Canadian mills operating.
According to the USW, US Steel operated US Steel Canada in a way that caused it to “significantly underperform, thereby incurring substantial losses rather than achieving profitability and requiring it to incur significant debt.” “In essence,” wrote Wilton-Siegel, “the USW argues that USSC would not have needed to commence these CCAA proceedings but for the decisions taken by USS regarding the operations of USSC.”
Milbourne argued that, that “in its management of the former assets of Stelco as part of its North American flat-rolled group of steel plants, USS took actions to idle the blast furnaces and steelmaking units of USSC, which resulted in significant losses to USSC, while USS continued to supply the former customer base of USSC from its steel plants in the United States.”
According to the objectors, some of US Steel’s claim is not really debt but equity investment in the company and, therefore, should be at the bottom of the creditors list.
By reducing the amount owed to US Steel, the USW hopes to increase the cash available for the underfunded pension plans of 14,000 retirees. The plans are underfunded by more than $830 million.
Objectors also worry that if the $2.2 billion claim is left to stand, US Steel will use it in a credit bid to buy Lake Erie Works, canceling some of the debt to pay for the transaction. Reducing some of the debt would also reduce US Steel’s leverage in a restructuring plan for the Canadian mills.
A previous attempt by the objectors to use a legal doctrine called “equitable subordination” to reduce US Steel’s claims failed. Although the procedure can be used to bottom-list debt when a company has acted unfairly, it cannot be used in a CCCA protection case.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Market Segment
Nucor targets ‘white hot’ data center boom
With infrastructure demand shifting toward digital capacity, Nucor Corp. is positioning itself as the go-to steel supplier for the data center boom.
Gerdau’s N. American earnings rise in Q3 due to fall in imports
Gerdau’s North American profits rose in the third quarter, boosted by a decline in imports due to Section 232 steel tariffs.
Ternium swings to Q3 loss, eyes 2026 recovery
Ternium closed the third quarter with steady shipments and improving margins. But trade policy uncertainty and subdued demand in Mexico weighed on the Latin American steelmaker’s results.
SMU Mill Order Index fell in September
SMU’s Mill Order Index declined in September after repeated gains from June through August. The shift came as service center shipping rates and inventories fell.
Algoma’s losses widen in Q3 as tariff troubles continue
Algoma Steel’s net loss more than quadrupled in the third quarter on trade woes and its EAF transition. Separately, the company announced a change in leadership, as CEO Michael Garcia will retire at the end of the year.