Steel Markets
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/f5aa9db1ff9cc0c20f176975fa297c7c.jpg)
IIHS Report Looks at Safety and Repair Costs of F-150
Written by Sandy Williams
August 2, 2015
The all-aluminum Ford F-150 is going to cost you more to repair—so says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
IIHS put the F-150 crew cab and the F-150 extended cab through a series of five crash tests. The crew cab model passed all of them with flying colors giving it the Top Safety Pick award. The extended cab, however, needs some improvements according to the IIHS crash results.
In a test that replicates a front driver side collision at 40 miles per hour, a crash of the crew cab version caused little to no injury to the Hybrid III dummy positioned at the steering wheel. In the collision of the extended cab F-150, vehicle structure “seriously compromised the driver’s survival space” by protruding into the cab by 10-13 inches and placing the steering column perilously close to the driver’s chest. The dummy’s head “barely contacted the front airbag before sliding off to the left and hitting the instrument panel” reported IIHS.”
IIHS then looked at repair costs for the two vehicle models. Comparing a 2015 aluminum F-150 and the 2014 steel-bodied F-150, IIHS replicated two low speed crashes. In the first test, the steel vehicle struck the front left corner of the aluminum pickup at 10 mph with a 15 percent overlap. In the second test the front left corner of the aluminum vehicle struck the rear corner of the steel one at the same speed and overlap.
In both tests the aluminum F-150 had more extensive damage than its steel counterpart. Both trucks were repaired at a Ford aluminum repair certified dealership. The front test damage cost $4,147 for the aluminum model and $3,759 for the steel model. The rear collision test had similar repair results, $4,738 for the aluminum model and $3,276 for the steel pickup. Repairs were 26 percent higher for the aluminum model.
Part of the cost to repair the front damage to the aluminum F-150 was due to extra time required that increased labor costs. In the aluminum model, mechanics had to assemble wiring harnesses and splash guards before a new front fender could be attached. The extra time added 22 percent to labor costs when compared to the steel model.
In the rear end crash, both vehicles had damage to the truck bed. The aluminum pickup needed a replacement part while the steel one could be repaired. Both vehicles needed new tail lamps, bumpers and exhaust pipes. Replacement part costs were 42 percent higher for the 2015 F-150.
The models were chosen to be reviewed because of consumer concern over the use of aluminum.
“The Institute picked the F-150 to test first because it is not only the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. but also the first mass-market vehicle with an all-aluminum body,” said the IIHS report.
When requirements to improve safety in small overlap crashes were passed, the extended cab F-150 was still in development, said a spokesperson for Ford, adding that changes will be included in the 2016 models for the supercab and regular cap pickups.
Consumer costs are in the limelight when it comes to repairs for aluminum vehicles, but body shops also incur additional costs which may be passed on to consumers. Repair methods are different for steel and aluminum and require additional training for mechanics and welders who perform service on the F-150. Due to safety requirements, there can be no cross contamination of aluminum and steel dust during repairs. Body shops must have a separate room or enclosed area to perform aluminum repairs, equipped with appropriate dust extraction methods. Separate tools are required to avoid cross contamination that could lead to corrosion.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Markets
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/coils2.png)
US steel imports slipped in August after rising in July
July represents the second-lowest monthly rate for steel imports so far this year.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/steel_trade.png)
CRU Insight: Decarbonization will reshape global steel trade flow
This CRU Insight explores how decarbonization will play a significant role in redefining steel trade patterns by shifting regional competitiveness and increasing steel demand needs.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/price_question.png)
Steel Summit 2024: Leading analysts forecast coming year for steel
Leading industry analysts on Monday discussed steel prices and how they will be impacted by trade policy, consolidation, mill discipline, November’s elections, and more.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/AISI.png)
AISI: Raw steel output jumps, capability surpasses 80%
Having risen for three weeks in a row, weekly production is now at the highest rate seen since February 2023.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/worldsteel_logo.png)
Monthly steel output falls in China, rises in RoW
Global steel output fell 5% in July according to World Steel Association’s (worldsteel) latest release. Total steel mill production around the world tallied up to 152.8 million metric tons (mt) for the month of July, the second-lowest monthly rate seen this year.