SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24698/24698644860f4c138f3aa33a5f220fcfc423c491" alt=""
February 2015 Steel Data at a Glance
Written by John Packard
March 1, 2015
February and its 20 shipping days is now behind us. It is time to take a look at how the data for the month played out.
SMU Price Momentum Indicator ended the month just as it had begun the month (as well as the New Year), pointing toward lower flat rolled steel prices in the coming thirty days.
SMU Steel Buyers Sentiment Index averaged +49.5 for the month but, our index did end the month on an upswing at +53. Our three month moving average (3MMA) continued to decline and stood at +52.83 at the end of February, down 2.5 points from January’s +55.33.
Benchmark hot rolled ended the month averaging $516 over the four weeks reported. We were the same as the Platts average during the same time period. CRU was $10 per ton higher than both SMU and Platts at $526 per ton for the month.
Scrap prices were significantly lower on all products (#1 HMS, shredded and #1 busheling) in the Midwest.
Zinc and aluminum spot prices remained essentially unchanged compared to January.
Capacity utilization rates declined which is not a good omen for the domestic steel mills.
One of the reasons why utilization rates have declined is due to the drop in drilling rigs in the U.S. which averaged 1,882 rigs in January and now are down to an average of 1,348 rigs in February. This is a loss of 534 drilling rigs.
Apparent Excess, which is a Premium product, calculates whether the U.S. service centers are over inventoried or under-inventoried. We saw a slight dampening to the excess inventory levels for flat rolled. Distributor inventories continue to be in excess but are down 82,000 tons compared to the month of January. At 1.1 million tons, service centers still have a long way to go.
The HRC (hot rolled coil) futures forward curve is in contango (prices are higher the further you go out into the future) with September 2015 showing $550 per ton.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dbb/86dbb0d3b496ed0eee897be96c3f427d3b4c83d8" alt=""
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index jumps, Future Sentiment slips
SMU’s Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index rocketed up this week, while the Future Buyers’ Sentiment Index edged down. The two indices are almost at parity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226d9/226d9b4d98ede05bee1f5738951198dc996994ea" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times stretch to 10-month highs
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that steel mill lead times were stretching out this week for sheet and plate products tracked by SMU. The results weren’t much of a surprise. Production times have begun moving out following a wave of frenzied buying in response to stricter Section 232 announced by the Trump […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mills slam door on buyers looking to talk price
Mills’ flexibility on price for spot orders has taken a nosedive to levels not seen since the end of March 2023.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment indicates increased optimism
After reaching multi-month lows in mid-January, SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices rebounded this week to some of the highest readings recorded in months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times fluctuate, extensions expected
While we have seen some movements in recent weeks, steel mill production times remain within a few days of the historical lows observed over the last two years, a trend observed since mid-2024.