Steel Mills
Steel Mills Cry Foul But Dumping is Hard to Prove
Written by John Packard
January 29, 2015
So far Steel Market Update has heard a similar cry in each steel mill earnings conference call. The domestic mills are not happy about the amount of foreign steel coming into the country and the growing percentage of market share foreign steel is taking from the domestic mills.
We are hearing a couple of terms which are not interchangeable but are both important pieces of the puzzle when steel mills consider filing a trade case under U.S. law. These are “dumping” and “injury” and we turned to two attorneys (Roger Schagrin and Lewis Leibowitz) who are experts on the subject to provide us insights:
Dumping means:
1) That the steel is being sold at less than their domestic market pricing or,
2) That the steel being sold is less than their cost to produce the product.
After the mills file a trade case the “Dumping” portion is found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (US DOC)
Injury means:
The domestic steel industry producing competing products is suffering real or imminent threat of material injury.
After a country or foreign mill has been found to be “dumping” then “Injury” is determined by the International Trade Commission (ITC)
A successful dumping order requires both dumping and injury.
We asked trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz about the subject of dumping and what is needed in order to file a trade case against foreign steel. Here is what he had to say:
“I want to explain this in detail. To start, a dumping order requires both dumping (found by the Commerce Dept.) and injury (found by the International Trade Commission).
“Dumping is underselling the home market price or selling below the cost of production. In a nonmarket case (e.g., China) the test is different. The home market price is not relevant. The test is based on the cost of production using the factors of production of the producer, but valued based on the costs in a market economy.
“Injury means material injury to the industry producing competing products in the US or a real and imminent threat of such injury. If half the Commissioners find injury or threat, the vote is considered affirmative.
“So both dumping and injury are required…
“The steel industry files cases sometimes that they don’t win. But they can disrupt hearken for a year by filing them.”
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
Hyundai mulls building sheet steel mill in southern US
Hyundai Motor Group is reportedly considering building a sheet steel mill just south of Baton Rouge, La.
Nippon/USS file lawsuits against US government, Cliffs, and USW head
Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel have filed two lawsuits, one against the US government and the other against Cleveland-Cliffs and the United Steelworkers (USW) union's leader.
CMC earnings slip on slow construction, low prices
Slow construction activity and low steel prices weighed down profits for Commercial Metals Company.
Leibowitz: Biden block of Nippon-USS deal has broad, mostly bad consequences
As one of my university professors once said (and it’s stuck with me for half a century), “Change is the only permanency.” On Friday, President Biden acted to block the acquisition of United States Steel by Nippon Steel Corp. of Japan, without acknowledging the changes that have already occurred in the steel industry, and which are likely to increase. After more than a year of raging debate, it seems that nobody was convinced by arguments. Nippon’s worker-centered concessions, including safeguarding the jobs of U.S. Steel’s unionized workers and committing to more than $2 billion in investments for the aging plants at Gary, Ind., and the Mon Valley complex in Pennsylvania, were not mentioned in the president’s announcement on Friday.
Burritt hits back after Biden thwarts USS/Nippon deal
The chief executive of U.S. Steel has come out against President Biden’s decision to block the USS/Nippon Steel deal, calling it “corrupt.”