SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e320f/e320f73e3c5e02453c6f79c1c8c97f840900cbd6" alt=""
SMU Survey: Steel Mills Willing to Negotiate Flat Rolled Steel Prices
Written by John Packard
January 8, 2015
The previous article about steel mill lead times being one week shorter than what we saw one year ago set the stage for what we are seeing when it comes to mill negotiations. Our survey respondents almost unanimously reported the domestic mills as willing to negotiate pricing on all flat rolled products.
We had 97 percent of our hot rolled respondents reporting the mills as willing to negotiate. It was 83 percent one month ago and 68 percent at the beginning of November. One year ago was the peak of the “up” cycle when only 35 percent of the respondents reported the domestic mills as willing to negotiate pricing (this popped up to 63 percent two weeks later).
Cold rolled saw 95 percent of our respondents reporting the mills as willing to negotiate pricing. This is up from 61 percent at the beginning of December and 52 percent at the beginning of November. One year ago only 31 percent of our respondents reported the domestic mills as willing to negotiate pricing on cold rolled (two weeks later cold rolled actually dropped to 19 percent).
We saw 92 percent of our respondents reporting galvanized prices as negotiable. This is up 3 percent from the beginning of December and 21 percentage points compared to the first week of November. One year ago only 38 percent reporting the mills as willing to negotiate galvanized pricing (two weeks later it rose to 61 percent).
Everyone responding to our query on Galvalume reported the mills as willing to negotiate. This is up 30 percent from the beginning of December and 42 percent compared to the beginning of November. One year ago only 20 percent reported the mills as willing to negotiate AZ pricing (two weeks later it jumped to 44 percent).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dbb/86dbb0d3b496ed0eee897be96c3f427d3b4c83d8" alt=""
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index jumps, Future Sentiment slips
SMU’s Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index rocketed up this week, while the Future Buyers’ Sentiment Index edged down. The two indices are almost at parity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226d9/226d9b4d98ede05bee1f5738951198dc996994ea" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times stretch to 10-month highs
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that steel mill lead times were stretching out this week for sheet and plate products tracked by SMU. The results weren’t much of a surprise. Production times have begun moving out following a wave of frenzied buying in response to stricter Section 232 announced by the Trump […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mills slam door on buyers looking to talk price
Mills’ flexibility on price for spot orders has taken a nosedive to levels not seen since the end of March 2023.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment indicates increased optimism
After reaching multi-month lows in mid-January, SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices rebounded this week to some of the highest readings recorded in months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times fluctuate, extensions expected
While we have seen some movements in recent weeks, steel mill production times remain within a few days of the historical lows observed over the last two years, a trend observed since mid-2024.