Steel Mills
Nucor and Reliance Steel to Appeal Antitrust Settlement Awarded to MM Steel
Written by Sandy Williams
April 2, 2014
A Houston, Texas jury returned a verdict for $52 million in damages against Nucor Corp., Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., its unit Chapel Steel Corp., American Alloy Steel Inc., and JSW Steel Inc. in an antitrust lawsuit brought by former plate steel distributor MM Steel, LP. SSAB was also named in the lawsuit but settled its dispute with MM Steel last month and was dismissed from the case.
MM Steel claimed the defendants conspired to boycott selling plate steel to MM Steel which forced the company out of business in 2012. The federal court awarded MM Steel $52 million in damages against all defendants jointly and individually, an amount that is subject to trebling (tripling) under anti-trust law. It is unknown at this time how much each company will pay.
MM Steel was formed in 2011 by two former Reliance Steel employees, Mike Hume and Matt Schultz, who ran the Houston office of Chapel Steel. The defendants in the antitrust case said they independently chose not to use MM Steel. The defendants contended that Hume and Schultz operated unethically by forming MM Steel before leaving Chapel Steel Corp and taking employees, proprietary information, and material from the company—litigation that was later settled in a separate case. American Alloy said the pair behaved similarly when leaving American Alloy Steel to open the Chapel Houston branch in 1999. American Alloy decided at that time not to do business with Hume and Schultz in the future.
SSAB contended that its policy was not to sell steel to distribution centers that did not provide substantial value-added processing or fabrication.
Reliance and Chapel Steel plan to challenge the verdict. Reliance CEO David Hannah commented, “We are deeply disappointed with the outcome of this trial and we continue to believe that Reliance and Chapel acted appropriately and within their legal rights.”
Robert J. Katerberg, a partner with Arnold & Porter and lead attorney for Nucor said, “We are disappointed with the verdict. Nucor denies violating any antitrust laws. We believe Nucor acted entirely within its legal rights. We will fight these allegations through the appeal process and we expect that Nucor will be vindicated.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills
Nippon could up investment in USS facilities to $7B: Report
It's the latest twist as the proxy battle heats up for Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel.
Hybar expansion still on the table as Arkansas mill startup nears
As Hybar nears the completion of its $700-million rebar mill in Arkansas, the company said it is still “actively considering” building other steel facilities in the southern US.
Global steel production edges lower in February
February’s global raw steel output is tied with last December's for the fourth-lowest monthly production rate recorded over the past two years.
Fate of U.S. Steel hangs in the balance
The future of U.S. Steel remains unclear, but the proxy fight for control of the company is heating up. Shareholders will cast their votes on the company's future at the annual meeting in May.
Cliffs to idle Dearborn blast furnace, restart Cleveland furnace by July
Cleveland-Cliffs has decided to idle the steelmaking operations at its Dearborn Works in Michigan due to weak automotive demand.