Steel Mills

EPA Orders Tighter Pollution Controls at Nucor Louisiana
Written by Sandy Williams
March 23, 2014
Following an unsuccessful attempt to block the air pollution permit for Big River Steel, Nucor Corp. finds itself on the on the receiving end of tighter air pollution orders from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The EPA has ordered the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) to require Nucor Steel Louisiana to take additional steps to reign in pollutants from the plant’s coke ovens at the St. James Parish facility. The DRI plant in Convent, La., began operations this past December.
The LDEQ must respond to the EPA decision by April 30.
In comments published in the Federal Registry on March 21, the EPA also objected to the DRI permit because of failure to include any emission limits for fine particulate matter of 2.5 microns or smaller.
The permit for a future pig iron plant at the site was found to have inadequate monitoring to ensure compliance with certain pollutant emission limits.
Three objections to the Nucor permit were presented to the EPA by the Louisiana Environmental Action Network and Sierra Club between 2010 and 2012. The EPA agreed with some of the objections by the environmental groups but ruled against a complaint in 2011 (Specific Objection 1) that the state improperly issued separate permits for the pig iron and DRI facility.
The 2010 Petition objected to the Nucor operating permit on the basis that: (1) The permit fails to apply the appropriate maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards; (2) the modeling submitted by Nucor to support its PSD analysis is flawed, and (3) the title V permit fails to incorporate conditions sufficient to assure compliance with PSD.
The 2011 Petition objected to two Nucor operating permits stating: 1) LDEQ failed to aggregate PSD permitting for emissions from the entire facility (this issue is also known as ‘‘Specific Objection I’’ in this matter); (2) the modified pig iron permit fails to apply MACT standards for the topgas boilers; (3) LDEQ failed to include emission limits for particulate matter less than 2.5 microns; (4) the limit for natural gas consumption is not the best available control technology for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) process; and (5) the DRI permits must specify procedures estimating GHG emissions.
The 2012 Petition reiterated the concerns of the previous permits and requested the EPA object to the Nucor operating permits based on those concerns. (Sources: Times-Picayune and US Federal Register)

Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills

Nippon could up investment in USS facilities to $7B: Report
It's the latest twist as the proxy battle heats up for Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel.

Hybar expansion still on the table as Arkansas mill startup nears
As Hybar nears the completion of its $700-million rebar mill in Arkansas, the company said it is still “actively considering” building other steel facilities in the southern US.

Global steel production edges lower in February
February’s global raw steel output is tied with last December's for the fourth-lowest monthly production rate recorded over the past two years.

Fate of U.S. Steel hangs in the balance
The future of U.S. Steel remains unclear, but the proxy fight for control of the company is heating up. Shareholders will cast their votes on the company's future at the annual meeting in May.

Cliffs to idle Dearborn blast furnace, restart Cleveland furnace by July
Cleveland-Cliffs has decided to idle the steelmaking operations at its Dearborn Works in Michigan due to weak automotive demand.