Steel Mills

ThyssenKrupp Steel USA: 2014 Contracts & Rumor Mill
Written by John Packard
December 3, 2013
There have been a number of rumors flying about the marketplace since the announcement of the ThyssenKrupp Steel USA facility in Calvert, Alabama. We thought it prudent to address a couple of the issues where we have some insights.
TK USA 2014 Contracts
Steel Market Update has been advised by ThyssenKrupp Steel USA customers that their 2014 contracts will be honored and that the sale of the plant to the joint venture of ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel Sumitomo Metals Corporation (NSSMC) will not impact those contracts. This includes quarterly, semi-annual and 2014 annual contracts either negotiated as firm prices or tied to some form of index.
From a common sense approach, the ArcelorMittal/NSSMC joint venture will need a base book of orders when they take possession of the mill sometime during the 2nd Quarter 2014. Eliminating contracts does not make sense from a continuation of business relationship basis.
One large service center contract customer of ThyssenKrupp Steel USA advised SMU in an email that their 2014 contracts would not be impacted by the AM/NSSMC purchase. Here is part of what they told us:
“For what it’s worth, TK advised today that a sale would not affect our 2014 annual contract. Supposedly, only deals that exceed 12 months may be “affected”. Not sure if this info is already being relayed from the buyers to the TK personnel, or how it’s being disseminated.
Assuming this info is correct, I’ve felt all along that by the time a deal would close (assuming late springtime soonest), AM/Nippon will be glad to have predictable tons in place via contracts, as a base of volume for them to work from. If they desire to ramp this newly acquired asset to full production, it wouldn’t seem to make sense to come in and tear-up or renegotiate contracts as a starting position. Plus, there may only be around 6 months remaining on contracts when they close a deal anyway. Instead, they can move on to focusing their efforts to secure new volumes, which only makes sense.”
The Mills will Announce a $60 Per Ton Increase Immediately Due to the Sale
There is a rumor in the market that the sale of TK USA will allow the domestic mills a platform from which they can announce a $60 per ton price increase.
Steel Market Update believes the purchase of TK by AM/NSSMC will have a short-term psychological impact on the market and for a short period of time may assist in keeping prices stable for a week, maybe two. Beyond that market fundamentals will most likely take over and prices will move in line with the fundamentals.
When we asked one of the top steel mill commercial people to comment on the rumor the response what I got was “Really? That would be wishful thinking…”
With hot rolled prices approaching $680 per ton ($34.00/cwt) and cold rolled and coated base price levels around $780 to $800 per ton ($39.00/cwt-$40.00/cwt) the mills are already at the higher level of the price range for the past couple of years. We are seeing some modest increases in scrap pricing but other commodities have been relatively flat over the past month. There is supply returning to the market and we are seeing foreign offers being priced at levels where business can be transacted (example: Chinese cold rolled prices at $34.00/cwt-$36.00/cwt effective – meaning extras are included – fob the port of Houston for April delivery).
SMU does not speak for the steel mills so they are free to announce whatever they feel is in their (and their customers) best interest. The last price increase announcements by AK Steel and Severstal in early November for a modest $30 and $20 per ton were not followed by all the mills. Is the timing right for a new round and can the $60 per ton be justified?
ArcelorMittal/NSSMC Has Control Over TK USA
The AM/NSSMC joint venture at the moment is nothing more than an announcement. No monies have changed hands. The purchase must go through government scrutiny by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. ArcelorMittal has already informed the marketplace that the earliest a closing could take place would be sometime during the 2nd Quarter 2014.
This means there can be no interaction between the commercial departments of ThyssenKrupp Steel USA and those of ArcelorMittal or Nippon Steel Sumitomo Metals Corporation.
The JV has no input into current prices (contract or spot) being quoted out of TK USA and will not be able to do so until they actually own the mill.

John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills

Nippon could up investment in USS facilities to $7B: Report
It's the latest twist as the proxy battle heats up for Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel.

Hybar expansion still on the table as Arkansas mill startup nears
As Hybar nears the completion of its $700-million rebar mill in Arkansas, the company said it is still “actively considering” building other steel facilities in the southern US.

Global steel production edges lower in February
February’s global raw steel output is tied with last December's for the fourth-lowest monthly production rate recorded over the past two years.

Fate of U.S. Steel hangs in the balance
The future of U.S. Steel remains unclear, but the proxy fight for control of the company is heating up. Shareholders will cast their votes on the company's future at the annual meeting in May.

Cliffs to idle Dearborn blast furnace, restart Cleveland furnace by July
Cleveland-Cliffs has decided to idle the steelmaking operations at its Dearborn Works in Michigan due to weak automotive demand.