Steel Products
Steel Buyers Basics: A Question About Competition & Freight
Written by John Packard
August 20, 2013
Steel Market Update (SMU) received a question related to the most recent “Steel Buyers Basics” article published in Sunday evening’s issue of Steel Market Update. The article was about “spread” in flat rolled steel pricing and how it is measured.
On Monday one of the transportation companies which recently joined SMU as a member provided the following insights and questions prompted by our article:
Thanks again for putting together such a great publication. Not being in the steel industry but a significant portion of my business tied to it I have gathered more insight and knowledge in the last couple months I have been with your publication then I received in 3 plus years of SBB and AMM.
I have one question related to the article you published in the Subject Line. As a transportation carrier this is used against us quite often. Obviously, there is some gamesmanship going to negotiate better freight rates which I understand completely. The threats I run into most on spreads from the US Mills not competing on product within the US but into the Mexican markets specifically automotive and more specifically Central Mexico which continues to grow. Basically, we hear the story that it is becoming more of a challenge for US Mills to compete because of price and freight rates. Reading this article I am beginning to think these spreads are not as much as I believed they were. Now, we are talking cold rolled automotive grades steel here so maybe those grades there are larger spreads and being that it is Mexico maybe it is becoming more of a challenge? Does that change the dynamics at all?
SMU response: To respond to your question. When dealing with spreads between USA and NAFTA countries (Mexico and Canada) the total price of the product is what is important. Unlike hot rolled – cold rolled and coated products carry a lot of “extras” – extras are added for special chemistries, surface, thickness (the lighter the steel the higher the price), formability, etc.
What is happening in Mexico is there are a number of new mills who are competing for the business the U.S. mills enjoyed. As the quality of the product improves in Mexico the more pressure you will receive from the USA mills for “competitive” freight rates so they can compete against the Mexican mills.
In some cases, they may be competing against foreign steel (China, Europe, etc.) and again freight becomes an important component to the bottom line quote to the end user.
If our readers have more insights into the Mexican automotive markets that they would like to share with our members please forward them to: info@SteelMarketUpdate.com. Your comments and questions are important to us as we strive to provide insights into the flat rolled steel industry.
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Products
Rig count update: US activity stable, Canada slips
The number of oil and gas rigs operating in the US remained unchanged this week for the second consecutive week, while Canadian activity declined, according to the latest data released from Baker Hughes.
SMU market survey results now available
SMU’s latest steel buyers market survey results are now available on our website to all premium members. After logging in at steelmarketupdate.com, visit the pricing and analysis tab and look under the “survey results” section for “latest survey results.” Past survey results are also available under that selection. If you need help accessing the survey results, or if […]
Domestic, offshore CRC prices steady
The price spread between US-produced cold-rolled (CR) coil and offshore products on a landed basis was unchanged in the week ended Dec. 20.
SMU Survey: Mill lead times contract slightly, remain short
Steel mill production times have seen very little change since September, according to buyers participating in our latest market survey.
Worthington Enterprises’ earnings dip in fiscal Q2’25
Worthington Enterprises' profits edged down in its fiscal second quarter of 205 vs. a year earlier. The company said a slump in sales in the quarter was due largely to the "deconsolidation" of the Sustainable Energy Solutions segment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024.